Recently in Murder/Manslaughter Category

"Troy's Law" - Proposed New Rules For Implementing the Death Penalty in America

September 28, 2011,

The execution of Troy Davis in Georgia was apparently carried out under a unique evidentiary standard. Instead of "beyond a reasonable doubt," as is used in most criminal prosecutions, or "probable cause," which is used in civil trials, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles used an oft-cited standard in their part of the country: "we know a black man did it, this man is black, so close enough."

The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles voted 3-2 (does it strike anyone else as barbaric that the clemency board vote doesn't have to be unanimous?) to deny Davis's clemency petition despite the fact that the ballistics evidence presented at his trial was later determined to be faulty, that seven of the nine witnesses who identified Davis at his trial as the shooter had recanted their testimony, that one of the two remaining witnesses who did not recant is suspected of being the real shooter (and had made admissions about being so), and the other remaining non-recanting witness had been up for 24 straight hours at the time he observed the shooting, saying that night that he would not recognize the shooter if he saw him again. In short, this kind of evidence would result in a quick "not guilty" verdict in any functioning justice system, yet in ours it resulted in a guilty verdict, the denial of all clemency petitions, and, as of September 21, the government injecting a lethal dose of Pentobarbital into the veins of one of its citizens.

Interestingly, the same clemency board that denied Davis's petition granted that of another man, who admitted that in 1988 he killed his former boss, a store manager at a lumber company in Douglas County, Georgia, by shooting him three times, beating him with a crowbar and, noticing signs of life persisting, finishing him off with a full paint can. This admitted killer, Samuel David Crowe, is white. The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles cited the fact that Crowe admitted his crime as one of the reasons for sparing him the death penalty and commuting his sentence to life in prison.

Troy Davis maintained his innocence until his moment of death, in fact reiterating his innocence to the family of the murder victim who, quite tellingly, chose to be present at the execution.

Now that three of the five members of the Georgia clemency board and the family of the murder victim finally have their feeling of sweet revenge, we propose to honor Troy Davis with some new guidelines, called "Troy's Law," which will prevent such glaringly unjust results in our severely broken criminal justice system:

No person shall be executed in any of the following circumstances:

1. If they were convicted in a state that was a member of the Confederate States of America and/or designated a slave state as a result of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 (this means you, Texas);
2. If, at trial, the prosecution relied on any eyewitnesses testimony to prove identity;
3. If any of the prosecution's evidence presented at trial is later discredited in any manner;
4. If the science underlying any of the prosecution's evidence presented at trial is later discredited in any manner;
5. If any misconduct whatsoever by the prosecution in relation to the conviction is later discovered;
6. If any of the jurors from the original trial later express doubts about their decision;
7. And, we shouldn't have to say this, but, if ANYONE on the clemency board thinks that clemency should be granted.

Or, better yet, abolish the death penalty altogether, since our system is terribly dysfunctional and viewed, appropriately, as primitive and barbaric by the rest of the civilized world.

Homeless Man Arrested 27 Years After Alleged Pleasanton Murder/Stabbing of 14-Year-old Girl

August 9, 2011,

Steven John Carlson was arrested Sunday, August 7th for the alleged stabbing and murder of Foothill High schoolmate Tina Faelz in 1984. The crime shocked the community and many close to the case are remembering the horrific details once again.

Faelz, 14, was last seen alive while walking home from school around 2:25 p.m. on April 5, 1984. Less than an hour after she took a shortcut through a dark culvert underneath Interstate 680, two other students found her body west of the freeway. She had been stabbed more than 15 times. Faelz had been walking home instead of taking the bus because of some problems she had been having with other students.

Carlson, who was 16 at the time of the murder, was taken into custody as he was being released from a Santa Cruz jail for unrelated drug charges and failing to appear in court. Carlson's name was initially not released to news organizations because he was a minor at the time of the murder. However, custody records from the Santa Cruz jail indicate that his arrest is in connection with Faelz's death. Carlson was questioned back in 1984 but was never arrested or charged in the case.

Two separate factors led to Carlson's arrest. First, unlike all other crimes, there is no statute of limitations on murder, allowing an arrest 27 years later. In California, the statute of limitations on any crime other than murder is usually the maximum amount of time a defendant can spend in custody for that offense. For example, the statute of limitations on cocaine possession is three years, and the maximum sentence for cocaine possession is also three years in prison (however, this statute of limitations rule/formula does not equate to an individual defendant's maximum sentence, as repeat offenders and those with prior strikes can receive more time in custody than a first-time offender).

The second significant thing that led to Carlson's arrest is not as new as the age-old lack of a statute of limitations on murder. In 2007, the Pleasanton Police Department re-submitted existing evidence in the Faelz murder to two separate labs for DNA testing. In October of last year, the FBI responded with a possible suspect, leading to Carlson's arrest on Sunday. As more and more criminal defendants are required to submit to DNA testing as a condition of receiving probation (all individuals in California who are sent to prison are already required to provide a DNA sample), law enforcement will have more tools to track down violent offenders.

While a large statewide DNA database may seem like a good thing, there are also privacy concerns. Many people question whether individuals charged with petty crimes really need to provide DNA samples. Others ask if it is ethical when prosecutors allow for fine reductions or waive other conditions of probation in exchange for a DNA sample from a defendant.

As many criminal defense attorneys and advocacy groups such as the Innocence Project are using DNA to help wrongly convicted defendants gain their freedom, law enforcement is also using DNA to solve old or closed cases. It raises the question of whether Carlson would have been free all this time if DNA testing had been available to the police in 1984.

Resources:

Santa Cruz transient arrested in 1984 stabbing death of Pleasanton school girl, MercuryNews.com, August 8, 2011